Opinion: Confusion remains a pandemic threat

Conflicting messaging has threatened public confidence in political and scientific leadership.

Healthy Debate 2 minute read June 10, 2021
pandemic confusion

Many of us are experiencing an 'infodemic.' Getty

By: Pooja Gandhi Arnav Agarwal

The AstraZeneca vaccine is approved.

The AstraZeneca vaccine is safe and effective in protecting older adults from symptomatic infection. Get the first vaccine available.

A national advisory committee recommends against the AstraZeneca vaccine in people aged 65 years or older.

The AstraZeneca vaccine is safe and effective in older adults – but Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are still preferred, with less questions around their efficacy and less concern about rare but serious blood clots.

Mixed messaging has been rampant throughout the pandemic and continues today. The vaccine landscape has been speckled with conflicting advice from different scientific bodies (sometimes from the same bodies at different times), and incongruencies in scientific and political stances. The messages above were disseminated in just over a month. 

And the phenomenon has not been limited to vaccines.

Are outdoor gatherings and the use of outdoor amenities safe? If so, why stay indoors and threaten the health and well-being of children and communities by banning the outdoors? Should in-person schooling re-open across the board, not at all or in some regions only? Do double-vaccinated individuals need to continue masking and physically distancing, and why do policies differ across the border? Is COVID-19 transmitted by droplets, airborne or both?

Pandemic fatigue is the most prevalent pandemic for many. Toronto restaurants have been closed to indoor dining for just over 360 days. Globally, that outruns Paris (about 260 days), London (259 days) and Hong Kong (two days). Only Toronto, Montreal and Los Angeles cross the 300-day mark.

Conflicting messaging has threatened public confidence in political and scientific leadership. As answers continue to teeter-totter from leading voices, many may be driven to their own interpretations, or perhaps worse, to turn their backs on potentially life-saving interventions and public health measures.

Health-care leaders have had to deal with more challenges than the threat of the virus alone – staying abreast of an “infodemic” and a rapidly evolving evidence base and suppressing misinformation, all while balancing the need for rapid decision-making with the need to preserve public trust and confidence.

That challenge remains today.

Pooja Gandhi is a speech and language pathologist and PhD candidate at the University of Toronto. Passionate about graphic medicine and an artist by her second calling, Pooja is co-developer of the Health Care in Hues series, focused on bringing narratives and perspectives from the pandemic to life through graphic medicine.

This story was originally published on Healthy Debate. Find the original story here.


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our community guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.